Friday, February 10, 2017

LAD #31

Image result for woodrow wilson
President Woodrow Wilson
 
In his Fourteen Points Speech, President Woodrow Wilson outlined to Congress how he believed the world should achieve post-Great War peace. He expressed his desire for self-determination (freedom to make own government), freedom of the seas, and free trade, among several paybacks for the war. He reached out to Germany, hoping there could be peace instead of hatred after the war, and also discussed how he wanted a better world in which there were no disputes that required wars to solve.
(Left to right) The “Big Four”: David Lloyd George of Britain, Vittorio Orlando of Italy, Georges Clemenceau of France, and Woodrow Wilson of the United States, the principal architects of the Treaty of Versailles.
The "Big Four" negotiators of the treaty: David Lloyd George (Britain), Vittorio Orlando (Italy), Georges Clemenceau (France), and Wilson
Wilson's speech is similar to the Treaty of Versailles since both outlined how peace could be achieved after the Great War, and four of Wilson's Fourteen Points are present in the treaty. However, the Treaty of Versailles ended up punishing Germany severely (they were ultimately force to sign it), while Wilson hoped for peace with Germany.


Tuesday, February 7, 2017

LAD #30

Judge Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.
In the Schenck v. United States case, Schenck sent a paper he wrote to draftees in which he articulated his belief that the draft was wrong, urging the draftees "not to submit to intimidation." He was charged with conspiracy to violate the Espionage Act (law stating it was a crime to mail or print information that inspires a movement against the war effort or promoted enemies), since he encouraged insubordination in the military, and tried to reduce the amount of people in the military (this was the "movement against the war effort" he inspired). Justice Holmes concluded that Schenck is not protected, and his words created a "clear and present danger . . . that Congress [had] a right to prevent. He also said that words that may be tolerable in peacetime can be punished during wartime, since they cause an increased threat in these times - in other words, in wartime, there can be a greater restriction of free speech since there are greater dangers that could happen. In the court's eyes, Schenck's words created a dangerous situation for the US since he discouraged war and tried to weakened the military, so Congress had the right to prevent him from doing so.
John Peter Zenger
This trial is similar to the John Peter Zenger trial since like Schenck, Zenger was trialed for speaking out against the government. Zenger inspired the free speech that Schenck believed he was protected by, however Zenger was acquitted while Schenck was convicted.